archived bulletins

St. Katherine the Great-Martyr Orthodox Mission


138 Fifth Avenue, Kirkland, Washington
(425) 637-0181
www.stkatherine.org
Rev. Fr. Benedict Crawford, Presbyter


Sunday, March 23, 2003: ST. GREGORY PALAMAS. Tone 5.

On this day we commemorate our father among the saints, Gregory Palamas, arch-bishop of Thessalonica (1360), the Martyr Nikon and 199 disciples with him in Sicily (251), Venerable Nikon, abbot of the Kiev Caves (1088), the Martyrs Philetas the Senator, his wife, Lydia, their sons Macedon and Theoprepius, Chronides the Notary, and Amphilochius the Captain, in Illyria (117-138), the Martyr Dometius of Phrygia, under Julian the Apostate (ca. 360-361), St. Pachomius, abbot of Nerekhta (1384), St. Bassian, archbishop of Rostov (1481), the Righteous Vasily of Manazea in Siberia (1600), the Monk-martyr Luke of St. Anne?s Skete on Mt. Athos (1802), and St. Enda of Aran, monk, the earliest leader of Irish monasticism (530).

Epistles: Heb. 1:10-2:3, and Heb. 7:26-8:2
Gospels: Mark 2:1-12, and John 10:9-16

SERVICES THIS WEEK

Monday 7:00pm: Vigil for Annunciation (Great Compline and Matins).
Wednesday 7:00pm: VESPERAL DIVINE LITURGY for the ANNUNCIATION of our Most Holy Lady, Theotokos and Ever-virgin Mary.
Saturday 7:00 pm: Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts.
Next Sunday 6:30 pm: Great Vespers, followed by Confessions.

ANNOUNCEMENTS:


ST. GREGORY PALAMAS AND THE VINDICATION OF ORTHODOX MYSTICISM

The following is taken and edited from Victories of Orthodoxy, two homilies presented by Dr. Constantine Cavarnos given at the Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church in Atlanta, Georgia, on Sunday, March 16, 1996:

Yesterday, I discussed the innovation and heresy of Iconoclasm, and explained how Orthodoxy confronted it and triumphed over it. In this evening's homily, I shall speak about certain other innovations and heresies that have appeared since then, and how the defenders of Orthodox Christianity opposed them with wisdom and vigor, and brought victory to the Church . . . .

I shall begin with an account of the 14th century heresy regarding the Light that emanated from our Lord Jesus Christ at His Transfiguration on Mt. Tabor, and the nature of Orthodox mysticism known as Hesychasm. That heresy was defended by the Latin-minded Byzantine theologians Barlaam, Akindynos, Gregoras, and some others. It was vigorously and effectively opposed by St. Gregory Palamas, one of the greatest mystics and theologians of the Orthodox Church.

St. Gregory is also known as St. Gregory of Thessalonica, because he served as Archbishop of that historic city. His memory is celebrated on the Second Sunday of Great Lent, and also on November 4th, the day of his death. This Second Sunday of Great Lent is regarded as a continuation of last Sunday's feast (the Sunday of Orthodoxy). The reason for this is the fact that while last Sunday we commemorated the definitive victory of the Orthodox Church over the heresy of Iconoclasm, today we shall celebrate the definitive victory of our Church over the heresy of the 14th century Latinizers: two of the greatest victories of Orthodoxy.

What was the nature of the heresy of the Latinizers? They taught that the Light which emanated from Christ at His Transfiguration on Mt. Tabor was created light, temporary and subjective. The Orthodox Church teachers, on the contrary, following Holy Tradition, taught that the Light was of an uncreated nature, was the eternal "energy" (energeia) or glory (doxa) of God.

In opposing the view of the Latinizers, of Roman Catholicism, the Orthodox theologians, chief of whom was St. Gregory Palamas, were defending not a personal view of theirs, but the traditional teaching of the Orthodox Church regarding God and man's relation to Him, in particular the teaching of Orthodox mysticism, of Hesychasm.

According to Orthodox mysticism, man has the possibility, by duly purifying himself through fasting, prayer, and other forms of spiritual struggle (askesis), and the acquisition of the virtues, of attaining theosis, "deification" or "divinization," that is, union with God. This union, according to Orthodox theology, is not with God's essence (ousia), but with His "energy" or "energies." Participation in God's essence is not possible. Man's participation in the Divine energies is experienced by Orthodox mystics as supernatural light, warmth, fragrance, and joy. More widely, it is experienced by Orthodox Christians as Divine grace that strengthens one in his struggle to attain purity and holiness.

The Latinizers, in rejecting the Orthodox distinction between God's essence and His "energy" or "energies," and the claim of Orthodox mystics to experience the latter as Uncreated, Divine Light, were denying the very possibility of man's coming into immediate contact with God, of achieving theosis. They were not following Holy Tradition, but the Roman Catholic philosopher and theologian Thomas Aquinas, who had lived a century before them. Their view implied that there is an unbridgeable chasm separating man from God.

A consequence of this heresy was the appearance of Deism in Western Europe. Deism is the relegation of God to a sphere altogether beyond human experience. This in turn leads to Agnosticism, the view that neither the nature of God nor His existence is knowable. Agnosticism, in turn, led to Atheism -- the assertion that God does not exist. And Atheism has led to Nihilism, which is a very widespread contemporary disease of the human mind. Nihilism is the state of mankind when people do not believe in the existence of God, do not believe in spiritual values, do not believe in the reality of truth.

St. Gregory of Thessalonica refuted the heretical, spiritually destructive view of the Latinizers, and defended the traditional Orthodox view. He asserted that the Light seen at the Transfiguration of Christ and by Orthodox mystics is an objective manifestation of God. His defense was declared sound by three synods which met in Constantinople in his lifetime. Two of them met in 1341, and one in 1351. A fourth synod met in the same city in 1368, nine years after his death, and again upheld his refutation of the heresy of the Latinizers. At that time he was officially proclaimed a Saint.

St. Gregory's victory, like the earlier victory of Orthodoxy over Iconoclasm, was a definitive triumph over a major heresy.

The very high esteem in which St. Gregory Palamas has been held through the centuries by the Orthodox for this victory and for his other contributions in the field of theology, as well as for his very holy character and way of life, is vividly expressed by the following Dismissal Hymn that is chanted in his honor:

Light of Orthodoxy, pillar and teacher of the Church, adornment of monastics, invincible champion of theologians, O Gregory thou wonderworker, boast of Thessalonica, preacher of grace: ever pray that our souls be saved.


COUNSELS FROM THE HOLY FATHERS

This is the great work of a man: always to take the blame for his own sins before God and to expect temptation to his last breath.

- St. Anthony the Great (4th c.)


Unfortunate is he who loves haste; he will meet with a multitude of annoying obstacles, and he will fume inwardly; through his desire for haste he will be irritated time without number.

- St. John of Kronstadt (+1908)


Many times we pray for someone who is ill, and others are praying for him also, and despite this, the person dies, and those who have prayed for him wonder why God did not hear their prayers. They do not realize that God did hear them, but that He knew what would be best. We do not know what would have been the outcome of that person's life had he lived. We should praise God for everything.

- From the Athonite Gerontikon


TO PLEASE MEN OR TO PLEASE GOD?

How important it is for us to hear these words! It reminds us of St. Paul, "Do I seek to please men or God? For if I still pleased men, I would not be a bondservant of Christ" (Gal. 1:10). These words speak to the heart of the issue. What motivates us -- the praise of men, or the praise of God? What repels us -- the criticism of men or the criticism of God? Are we God-centered or man-centered? As Christians, we live for God, we keep an eye on that final Day of Judgment when all will be revealed and all will stand before the dreadful throne of God. . . . May this be our aim in all that we do -- that we would be well-pleasing to God. May the opinions of men be of absolutely no consequence to us. May they not even be noticed. If they praise us, it doesn't matter, for we live for the praise of God. If they criticize or reject us, it doesn't matter, for we live to avoid the criticism of God. Our singular aim is this: to please God!

When I was driven from the city, I felt no anxiety, but said to myself: if the empress wishes to banish me, let her do so; the earth is the Lord's. If she wants to have me sawn asunder, I have Isaiah for an example. If she wants me to be drowned in the ocean, I think of Jonah. If I am to be thrown into the fire, the three children in the furnace suffered the same. If cast before wild beasts, I remember Daniel in the lion's den. If she wants me to be stoned, I have before me Stephen the first martyr. If she demands my head, let her do so; John the Baptist shines before me. Naked I came from my mother's womb, naked shall I leave this world. Paul reminds me, "If I still pleased men, I would not be the servant of Christ."

- St. John Chrysostom (4th century)